Jump to content

Talk:Chinese characters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 20:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oracle bone inscription on an ox scapula, 11th century BCE
Oracle bone inscription on an ox scapula, 11th century BCE
  • ... that according to legend, the invention of Chinese characters (oracle bone pictured) caused grain to rain from the sky and ghosts and demons to wail in frustration? Source: According to one tradition, Chinese characters were invented during the 3rd millennium BCE by Cangjie, a scribe of the legendary Yellow Emperor. Cangjie is said to have invented symbols called () due to his frustration with the limitations of knotting, taking inspiration from his study of the tracks of animals, landscapes, and the stars in the sky. On the day that these first characters were created, grain rained down from the sky; that night, the people heard the wailing of ghosts and demons, lamenting that humans could no longer be cheated.[1][2]
    • ALT1: ... that the oldest known Chinese characters were recorded on oracle bones (example pictured)? Source: The oldest attested Chinese writing comprises a body of inscriptions produced during the Late Shang period (c. 1250 – 1050 BCE), with the very earliest examples from the reign of Wu Ding dated between 1250 and 1200 BCE.[3][4]
    • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Remsense (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Remsense 04:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • I really like that first hook. Article is in great shape and eligible (congrats on the GA, btw), and I was able to confirm the story through Google Books keyword searching. QPQ is not needed. Looks like we're good to go. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh no, I've just realized that I somehow forgot that images need to be used in the article. I chose this one as the oracle bone image used in the article itself actually already appeared on DYK and I didn't think it'd look that good, so I selected another one we've used from Commons. Is there anything elegant I can do here, do you think? Remsense 06:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Yang, Lihui; An, Deming (2008). Handbook of Chinese Mythology. Oxford University Press. pp. 84–86. ISBN 978-0-195-33263-6.
  2. ^ Boltz 1994, pp. 130–138.
  3. ^ Boltz, William G. (1999). "Language and Writing". In Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge University Press. pp. 74, 107–108. ISBN 978-0-521-47030-8. Retrieved 3 April 2019 – via Google Books.
  4. ^ Liu, Kexin; Wu, Xiaohong; Guo, Zhiyu; Yuan, Sixun; Ding, Xingfang; Fu, Dongpo; Pan, Yan (2021). "Radiocarbon Dating of Oracle Bones of the Late Shang Period in Ancient China". Radiocarbon. 63 (1): 155–175. Bibcode:2021Radcb..63..155L. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.90.
Amazing hook Remsense! Zanahary 20:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Be sure to thank TheLonelyPather for both the selection and the general wording! Remsense 03:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheLonelyPather You're a well-regarded king Zanahary 03:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! 天雨粟 鬼夜哭 Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 08:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you both, it's definitely one of the best DYKs I saw recently! Artem.G (talk) 07:32, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential source?[edit]

TWL's partnership with De Gruyter gives us access to O'Neill, Timothy Michael (2016). Ideography and Chinese Language Theory: A History. Worlds of East Asia, vol. 26. De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110459234. ISBN 9783110459234.

The second half of this source seems like it could be helpful for expanding the section on the traditional 說文解字 classification, and maybe some stuff about the 爾雅. It does talk more about language theory (as foretold by the title) than writing systems, and the book swings wildly into Derrida and Nietzsche at times, but there should be useful information in there, whether for this article or some other one.

Congratulations on the GA and DYK btws! Folly Mox (talk) 21:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Folly, you were a huge help to me, especially in the very early going when I had much less clue what I was doing.
Funny, this was actually one of the first books I read when researching sinograms, and I think that's why I haven't tried to cite it here for some reason. Obviously it's an RS and its claims are not particular to it, in addition to being a book I recommend quite often, so yeah good point! Remsense 04:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Folly Mox, what do you think needs to be added to this article re: 說文解字? My best attempts to be brief in my post-GA additions still have me butting up under 9600 words, and I wonder if I can keep under 10k in getting the article to FAC-ready state. Remsense 13:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remsense, I'm acknowledging having read your question here, and I'll do my best to think about it sometime this weekend when hopefully I will have the brainpower for a brief glimmer of intelligence. Folly Mox (talk) 11:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Number of characters[edit]

Should the number of Chinese characters be in this article? — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 13:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is not and cannot be a well-defined number as such. Moreover, there are already several points where numbers that answer similar, better-defined questions are given in the article, surely? Remsense 14:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]